I'm Kenny Wong. I've been trading since 2007, and since 2024 my Western Sushi PAMM has run fully on autopilot. The chart below comes straight from Myfxbook, so I couldn't polish these numbers even if I wanted to.
For the record: I finished high school and that was the end of my formal education. No finance degree, no name-brand university. Everything behind this fund was learned through real losses, real drawdowns, and a stubborn refusal to keep repeating the same mistakes.
I started trading forex and failed for six straight years. No system, no discipline. I chased setups, got excited by short winning streaks, and got wiped out by the losing streaks that followed.
I discovered grid and martingale trading and thought I had finally cracked the code. For the first time, my account climbed smoothly, month after month.
I turned it into a real PAMM fund, Multi-3000, trading other people's capital. It returned 1 to 4 percent every single month, year after year. Investors were happy. I was confident.
Then the bill arrived. A 40 percent drawdown, dug by the tail risk that smooth equity curve had been quietly hiding for years. It took three and a half years of grinding recovery just to get my investors back to their high watermark. I do not talk about risk from a textbook. I paid for that lesson.
I rebuilt everything from zero. Every trade now carries a fixed, hard stop-loss. No grid, no martingale, no recovery tricks dressed up as clever money management. Then two full years of walk-forward testing before I trusted the new system with real capital.
Western Sushi went live with real capital. I moved between brokers a few times in the first year before settling with my current broker, which is why the continuous Myfxbook record you see on this site starts in August 2025. I would rather show you a shorter record that is fully verifiable than a longer one you would have to take my word for.
Western Sushi runs a diversified portfolio of individually risk-capped breakout and mean reversion strategies, and the fund recently reached a new all-time high. The full track record is public on Myfxbook, drawdowns included. After everything above, I would want you to be skeptical of anything smoother.
This list is not theory to me. My first fund ran on grid and martingale for five profitable years, then gave back 40 percent in 2019. Every rule below is policy written by that experience.
Every trade enters with a calculated position size, so the risk is known before the order is placed. You will never see my lot sizes ballooning after a losing streak.
When the portfolio hits a limit, we stop. Strategies that show signs of decay are retired immediately, not averaged down, not "given another chance" with fresh capital.
Every entry comes from the system's rules. Nothing gets opened because I am frustrated about the last trade or trying to win back a bad day.
Breakout systems across gold and the major pairs, spread over different sessions and market conditions. The portfolio is rarely idle, and no single trade is big enough to sink the account.
A PAMM account means funds sit in your own account at a regulated broker. I can trade the allocation, but I can never withdraw it. You can.
Send me an email at me@kennyfx.pro and tell me you want to join the Western Sushi PAMM. I handle the entire setup myself, no account managers, no forms to hunt for.
I'll match you with a regulated broker that accepts clients from where you're based, and walk you through opening and funding an account in your name there. Your money sits with them, never with me. Once allocated, all 72 strategies trade it automatically.
Watch performance in your broker's dashboard and cross-check it on Myfxbook. Your funds stay under your control, so you can request a withdrawal whenever you choose.
A full breakdown: principal, gain, and my fee, so there's nothing to take on faith. This is a historical illustration, not a promise. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Before any of the 72 strategies is allowed to touch real money, it has to pass four separate tests. Most candidates fail. The ones running in the fund are the survivors.
A normal backtest checks one single run through history, and a strategy can pass it by luck. CPCV chops history into blocks and tests the strategy on many different combinations of those blocks, with buffer gaps so it can never peek at data sitting next to the test period. A strategy has to make money across dozens of different slices of the market, not one lucky stretch.
If a strategy is profitable with a setting of 20 but loses money at 19 or 21, it did not find an edge, it found a coincidence. I deliberately nudge every parameter, plus spread and execution assumptions, and watch what happens. A real edge degrades slowly when you shake it. A fluke falls apart immediately, and flukes never make it into the fund.
A backtest shows you one version of history, the one that happened to occur. I take each strategy's trades and reshuffle them over 100,000 times to map out every path those same trades could have taken. That tells me the realistic worst-case drawdown, not just the friendly one the original backtest showed. A strategy that only looks safe on its own lucky path does not get funded.
Curve fitting means tweaking a strategy until the backtest looks perfect, which really means it memorized the past. To rule this out, I optimize only on 2010 to 2019 data and keep 2020 onward locked away. The strategy then has to perform on those unseen years exactly as it did in testing. If the results collapse on fresh data, it was memorizing, and it gets thrown out.
You should be. Most track records in this industry are screenshots. Mine is a public account you can dig through trade by trade. Do that first, then decide.